Obama challenging certain members of the black community to do better??? Oh my! And Jesse Jackson wanting to castrate Obama for making this request. What is wrong with this scenario?
I thought Jesse Jackson and the NAACP wanted to help improve the quality of life for their people. I mean you see these same people support things like the United Negro College Fund and make demands to government for better opportunities for their people. Ok so what is the deal when a presidential candidate like Obama challenges certain members of the black community to do better?
Taking the Ricky Ricardo approach; "Jesse you have some explaining to do!"
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Obama - Universal Health Care
Universal Health Care is a hot topic with many. Here is a t-shirt that captures the essence of the true price of Universal Health Care.Get your shirt now and get people thinking about the true cost of "free" health care.
Go here to get your t-shirt!
Obama - The Candidate For Change T-Shirt
Anti-Obama campaign shirts have just been released! Be one of the first to have this rare t-shirt print!
Go here to get yours' now!!!
Go here to get yours' now!!!
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Don't let Obama "steer" you in the wrong direction
Aldous Huxley, the author of the famous book "Brave New World", also constructed an essay titled "Propaganda under a Dictatorship" in which he introduces the idea of "herd poisoning".
I would like to direct this concept to followers and potential followers of Obama who have been caught up in the mass euphoria and explain why they have been mesmorized so easily.
Huxley explains that "the masses are utterly contemptible. They are incapable of abstract thinking and uninterested in any fact outside the circle of their immediate experience. Their behavior is determined not by knowledge and reason, but by feelings and unconscious drives."
He goes on to explain the propaganda strategies by Hitler who made his strongest appeal to those members of the lower middle class who had been ruined by the inflation of 1923 and then ruined all over again by the depression of 1929 and the following years. Huxley explains, "Hitler spoke of "The masses" which were considered the bewildered, frustrated, and chronically anxious group of millions. To make them more masslike, more homogenously subhuman, he assembled them, by the thousands and the tens of thousands, in vast halls and arenas, where individuals could lose their personal identity, even their elementary humanity, and be merged with the crowd. A man or woman makes direct contact with society in two ways; as a member of some familial, professional or religous group, or a as a member of a crowd. Groups are capable of being as moral and intelligent as the individuals who form them; a crowd is chaotic, has no purpose of its own and capable of anything except intelligent action and realistic thinking."
This concept set forward by Huxley helps explain why prominent and intelligent people can mix into a crowd and lose all forms of reasoning power. This is the reason why the concept of universal healthcare seems like a grand idea even if the real impact of such a plan would devastate America. It seems people rather give precedence to emotions and not facts. Ever heard of "buyer's remorse"? They say people buy on emotion and reason with logic. After your emotions settle down after buying that decked out new car with an added warranty that you didn't need, you start to realize the true impact of your decision with logic and reason. You realize your emotions have deceived you and got you into a binding contract that is not in your favor. Emotions can be deceiving because when you are caught in the immediate experience, you are not always capable of analyzing the true long term impact of the information being transmitted to you, because it is your very emotional framework that the orator is going after and tailoring to. Any public speaking 101 class will teach you that! This same concept goes for the people at an Obama rally.
This mass "Obama" euphoria is happening for a very strategic reason and I believe it is dangerous and deceptively calculated. Barack Obama is preying on the same feelings, hopes, and aspirations of people that Hitler appealed to in Nazi Germany from 1923-1929. It is no different.
Beware of herd poisoning. Don't let yourself get "steered" in the wrong direction.
Think!!!
I would like to direct this concept to followers and potential followers of Obama who have been caught up in the mass euphoria and explain why they have been mesmorized so easily.
Huxley explains that "the masses are utterly contemptible. They are incapable of abstract thinking and uninterested in any fact outside the circle of their immediate experience. Their behavior is determined not by knowledge and reason, but by feelings and unconscious drives."
He goes on to explain the propaganda strategies by Hitler who made his strongest appeal to those members of the lower middle class who had been ruined by the inflation of 1923 and then ruined all over again by the depression of 1929 and the following years. Huxley explains, "Hitler spoke of "The masses" which were considered the bewildered, frustrated, and chronically anxious group of millions. To make them more masslike, more homogenously subhuman, he assembled them, by the thousands and the tens of thousands, in vast halls and arenas, where individuals could lose their personal identity, even their elementary humanity, and be merged with the crowd. A man or woman makes direct contact with society in two ways; as a member of some familial, professional or religous group, or a as a member of a crowd. Groups are capable of being as moral and intelligent as the individuals who form them; a crowd is chaotic, has no purpose of its own and capable of anything except intelligent action and realistic thinking."
This concept set forward by Huxley helps explain why prominent and intelligent people can mix into a crowd and lose all forms of reasoning power. This is the reason why the concept of universal healthcare seems like a grand idea even if the real impact of such a plan would devastate America. It seems people rather give precedence to emotions and not facts. Ever heard of "buyer's remorse"? They say people buy on emotion and reason with logic. After your emotions settle down after buying that decked out new car with an added warranty that you didn't need, you start to realize the true impact of your decision with logic and reason. You realize your emotions have deceived you and got you into a binding contract that is not in your favor. Emotions can be deceiving because when you are caught in the immediate experience, you are not always capable of analyzing the true long term impact of the information being transmitted to you, because it is your very emotional framework that the orator is going after and tailoring to. Any public speaking 101 class will teach you that! This same concept goes for the people at an Obama rally.
This mass "Obama" euphoria is happening for a very strategic reason and I believe it is dangerous and deceptively calculated. Barack Obama is preying on the same feelings, hopes, and aspirations of people that Hitler appealed to in Nazi Germany from 1923-1929. It is no different.
Beware of herd poisoning. Don't let yourself get "steered" in the wrong direction.
Think!!!
Former CIA Director says Obama is Dangerous
In a town hall meeting recently, Obama made claims that the GOP is responsible for Osama bin Laden going free and that the GOP also helped engineer the distraction (Iraq War) that took their eye off of the people who committed 9-11.
People who really have minds and can think rationally will know that the GOP along with Democrats made joint decisions to enter into Iraq and commit the United States to fighting terrorism abroad. If the statement about the GOP engineering a distraction is true, then the Democratic party must also be included because members of that party voted to enter Iraq, including Senator Clinton. Mr. Obama is capitalizing on the ignorance of the uninformed or rather those that would rather not think for themselves and as a result become victims of good old fashioned Nazi like "herd poisoning".
In a conference call with reporters, McCain adviser Randy Scheunemann said Tuesday: "Senator Obama is a perfect manifestation of a September 10th mind-set. ... He does not understand the nature of the enemies we face."
Former CIA director James Woolsey said Obama has "an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism ... and toward dealing with prisoners captured overseas who have been engaged in terrorist attacks against the United States."
I think a former CIA director is a credible and reliable source when it comes to analyzing a presidential candidate.
He says Obama is dangerous, I agree.
People who really have minds and can think rationally will know that the GOP along with Democrats made joint decisions to enter into Iraq and commit the United States to fighting terrorism abroad. If the statement about the GOP engineering a distraction is true, then the Democratic party must also be included because members of that party voted to enter Iraq, including Senator Clinton. Mr. Obama is capitalizing on the ignorance of the uninformed or rather those that would rather not think for themselves and as a result become victims of good old fashioned Nazi like "herd poisoning".
In a conference call with reporters, McCain adviser Randy Scheunemann said Tuesday: "Senator Obama is a perfect manifestation of a September 10th mind-set. ... He does not understand the nature of the enemies we face."
Former CIA director James Woolsey said Obama has "an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism ... and toward dealing with prisoners captured overseas who have been engaged in terrorist attacks against the United States."
I think a former CIA director is a credible and reliable source when it comes to analyzing a presidential candidate.
He says Obama is dangerous, I agree.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Supreme Court Supports Terrorism!
Today was a sad day in American history. The Supreme ruled 5-4 in favor to give detainees in the war on terror held at Guantanamo the constitutional right to challenge their incarceration in the federal courts.
First off, these terrorists or even suspected terrorists are not U.S. citizens and are enemies to the state. What does this say to our soldiers engaged in the war on terror? Do they have to read these jihadists their Miranda rights first before incarcerating them? This ruling enables the enemy even more.
So if the U.S. apprehends Osama Bin Laden, does he get due process and passage to the appellate courts too? This is obscene what the court has done. Oh and U.S. taxpayers will be proud to know that their tax dollars will now be going to fund the support of terrorism. The federal courts will be actively involved now in hearing appeals from detainees. Who is going to pay for that? That's right, good ol' Uncle Sam.
And of course, Shiek Obama supports the court's ruling, which speaks volumes about which kind of justice he would nominate if a vacancy became a available on the high court during his stint as president if it happened.
We need to be concerned about the Constitution, the court, and the unborn in this election.
A wrong choice with the Supreme Court can set many bad things in motion as demonstrated today. We don't need another liberal on the highest court of the land.
First off, these terrorists or even suspected terrorists are not U.S. citizens and are enemies to the state. What does this say to our soldiers engaged in the war on terror? Do they have to read these jihadists their Miranda rights first before incarcerating them? This ruling enables the enemy even more.
So if the U.S. apprehends Osama Bin Laden, does he get due process and passage to the appellate courts too? This is obscene what the court has done. Oh and U.S. taxpayers will be proud to know that their tax dollars will now be going to fund the support of terrorism. The federal courts will be actively involved now in hearing appeals from detainees. Who is going to pay for that? That's right, good ol' Uncle Sam.
And of course, Shiek Obama supports the court's ruling, which speaks volumes about which kind of justice he would nominate if a vacancy became a available on the high court during his stint as president if it happened.
We need to be concerned about the Constitution, the court, and the unborn in this election.
A wrong choice with the Supreme Court can set many bad things in motion as demonstrated today. We don't need another liberal on the highest court of the land.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
